tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-76639322024-03-07T12:12:25.349-08:0021st Century Reformation21st Century Reformation is dedicated to the task of making disciples of Jesus Christ and building morally beautiful community.bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.comBlogger615125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663932.post-62273591545838148342023-08-14T07:10:00.003-07:002023-08-14T07:10:27.238-07:00My Friend Jim<p> <span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; white-space-collapse: preserve;">I was on my way to the grocery store. I went out my front door and saw my neighbor working on his garden. </span></p><span id="docs-internal-guid-72e14283-7fff-2c59-ddcb-0e1fe1d85364"><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">“Hi, Jim”</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">“Hi, Brad”</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">“Hey, did I tell you I preached at my church last weekend.” </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">“You had a preacher at your church.”</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">“Haha, no, I preached at my church.” </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">“Wow, cool, what did you preach about?” </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Jim lives across the street, but he used to live in the house I live in. In fact, he built the second floor onto our house when he owned it. He told me a story about a woman he loved who slipped into some form of fundamentalism. He seemed heartbroken by it still. .</span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">“Well, my sermon starts with a story about my youth. When I was in high school, my coach told me I could win an Olympic gold medal, and I believed him. It changed my life.”</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">“It gave you purpose!!” </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">“Yeah, exactly, I knew my goal, my destination, and I disciplined myself. And most Christians don’t know their destination, so they don’t know how to get there. That was my point of telling the story. They think they are going to heaven, so they pray a lot and tend to the health of their soul. But, in fact our destination is justice, just community. When Jesus talked about the Kingdom of God, He was talking about justice.”</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">“Yeah.”</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">“So our goal is to model the ideal of how human beings ought to live together. And then I said ‘How do we do that? We apologize.’”</span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">As I talked, I noticed Jim started to cry. His eyes welled up with tears. Jim is elderly. </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">“I often think during the day,” Jim began, “‘what is my purpose? How can I find meaning in the moment?’ I ground myself.”</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">“Do you know who Victor Frankl is?” I said.</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">“I have heard of him.”</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">“Yeah his famous book is Man’s Search for Meaning. He is a holocaust survivor. He observed why people die or kinda lost hope in the concentration camps. They lose purpose.”</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">“Right. They say, ‘People get old when they stop striving.’”</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">“Yeah. I remember talking to a pastor once. He said to me 'Brad, you are too hard on yourself.’ I said, ‘No, I am not hard enough on myself.’ It is work and challenging ourselves that makes our life exciting.”</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">A tear went down Jim’s cheek. </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">“I love you, Brad”</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">“I love you too, Jim”</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">We hugged, and I got in my car. As I got in my car, I remembered a discussion I had today at lunch with my pastor. We were talking about pastors who demand loyalty. They are insecure. My pastor said, “They are not comfortable in their own skin, in who they are.”</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">I laughed. I had a deep sense of my own ability to connect with my neighbors. I love open, transparent, authentic discussions, connections with folk. </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">How can I not be happy? I just made a human connection with my neighbor. Life is good.</span></p><div><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"><br /></span></div></span>bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663932.post-14693170827462636782018-07-07T12:23:00.002-07:002018-07-07T21:19:31.174-07:00EXISTENTIALISM - Nietzsche and Embracing the Present - Part 1<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt; text-indent: 36pt;">
<span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: "arial"; font-size: 11pt; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> A very significant mistake that Christianity has consistently made is the propagating of theologies that inadvertently, or sometimes intentionally, discourage the celebration of the body and the embracing of the joys of human experience. Life as it is, just as it is, life under the sun, has many simple pleasures, the simple pleasures of experience. To embrace life is to celebrate discovering an idea, falling in love, running on the beach, crying at a funeral, smiling at a wedding, your honeymoon, caring for your elderly parents, watching TV with your dad, waking up early, sleeping in, dancing with a partner, dancing alone, arguing politics, seeing your kids born, rock and roll, getting drunk, experimenting and taking risks, failure, being human. The early asceticism of the church was certainly a mixed bag at best and then came Augustine. Augustine was certainly a mixed bag as well. Augustine was a great intellect, but he made a few serious blunders. Now is not the time to critique Augustine, but it is time to deconstruct the theologies we inherit that do not allow us to truly love life as it is and ourselves as we are. Let’s just say that in a great deal of the language of 21st century evangelical practice, I observe a lot of self-loathing. </span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt; text-indent: 36pt;">
<span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: "arial"; font-size: 11pt; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Sure, Christianity gets a ton of things profoundly correct, but, when it comes to the realists’ embrace of life as it is and the joy of simply being a flesh and blood human being, Christian theology can become and has historically been somewhat toxic. </span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt; text-indent: 36pt;">
<span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: "arial"; font-size: 11pt; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">The essence of this mediation is an exercise in embracing some very insightful and profound ideas of people who are ideologically adversarial toward Christianity and, often, religious faith in general. </span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt; text-indent: 36pt;">
<span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: "arial"; font-size: 11pt; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Just 10 minutes ago, I was walking down a hall at work and considering whether to have a discussion about strategy with the owner of our company. He was on the phone and appeared to be in the middle of a rather lengthy conversation, so I decided that I would wait for another opportunity to talk. As I returned to my office, I paused for a second and thought, “What is beautiful about this moment?” Nothing in particular other than likely making the right decision to not impose on my boss. Then the thought came to me, “I’m back.” This “I’m back” is a recurring and very loaded phrase for me. It means I am back into a place of sensing God in the present and savoring the present as an end in itself. It is also a place of heightened impulse control. My energy is lower. I am less hyper-active, more reflective, and, certainly, very happy. I have a little saying that “if for 2% of my day I am in this place”, then I am “walking on water.” To me this is “revival.” It doesn’t really get much better than this. If as John Lennon says, “Life is what happens while we’re busy making plans,” then I have ceased making plans and, thereby, entered into actually living life. This is what Nietzsche meant by his thought experiment of “eternal recurrence”, and, though I am not a Nietzsche scholar, I think this is what he meant by declaring “God is dead.” </span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt; text-indent: 36pt;">
<span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: "arial"; font-size: 11pt; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">So here is a paradox, </span><span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: "arial"; font-size: 11pt; font-style: italic; font-weight: 400; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">“Is it possible that what I experience as the presence of God is similar, in some respects, to what Nietzsche was getting at via considering the implications of the death of god?”</span><span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: "arial"; font-size: 11pt; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> Let’s begin this query by considering Nietzsche’s thought experiment of eternal recurrence. </span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt; text-indent: 36pt;">
<span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: "arial"; font-size: 11pt; font-style: normal; font-weight: 700; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">The Thought Experiment of Eternal Recurrence</span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt; text-indent: 36pt;">
<span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: "arial"; font-size: 11pt; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">In </span><span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: "arial"; font-size: 11pt; font-style: italic; font-weight: 400; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Thus Spoke Zarathustra</span><span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: "arial"; font-size: 11pt; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">, Nietzsche proclaims “existence begins in every instance.” This idea of eternal beginning or that existence is beginning ever anew is identical to embracing the present, the challenge of the reassertion of greatness or perfection. But, it is also simultaneously the reassertion of our liberty and a resolution to absolute acceptance. It is an utter rejection of moralism and guilt and shame. To allow existence to begin in every instance is strangely, in its rejection of moralism, a rejection of the moralistic god and an embrace of the God of the I-Thou embrace. Thus paradoxically, it is both an embrace of God and the death of god. It is an absolute acceptance of all of oneself, one’s past, one’s hateful episodes and loving episodes, one’s wasted moments and one’s redeeming moments. To embrace life, one must escape the hand wringing moralism of religion. When, I accept not speaking to my boss as a good thing, I am accepting how weak I am and that the projection of my self in relation to my boss might or might not be a good thing. </span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: "arial"; font-size: 11pt; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">In the eternal recurrence, Nietzsche’s asks his readers to consider the following scenario. </span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 36pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: "arial"; font-size: 11pt; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">“What if some day or night a demon were to steal into your loneliest loneliness and say to you: ‘This life as you now live and have lived it you will have to live once again and innumerable times again; and there will be nothing new in it, but every pain and every joy and every thought and sigh and everything unspeakably small or great in your life must return to you, all in the same succession and sequence – even this spider and this moonlight between the trees, and even this moment and I myself…’ The question in each and every thing, ‘Do you want this again and innumerable times again?’ would lie on your actions as the heaviest weight! Or how well disposed would you have to become to yourself and to life </span><span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: "arial"; font-size: 11pt; font-style: italic; font-weight: 400; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">to long for nothing more fervently</span><span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: "arial"; font-size: 11pt; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> than for this ultimate eternal confirmation and seal?”</span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: "arial"; font-size: 11pt; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Life comes to us in the moment. We are who we are with all our memories and histories. To joyfully and adventurously embrace life on life’s terms in the immediate present just as it is without some corrective action necessary as a prerequisite to embracing the moment, we need to become “well-disposed” to ourselves and to life in order “</span><span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: "arial"; font-size: 11pt; font-style: italic; font-weight: 400; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">to long for nothing more fervently</span><span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: "arial"; font-size: 11pt; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> </span><span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: "arial"; font-size: 11pt; font-style: italic; font-weight: 400; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">than for this ultimate eternal confirmation and seal</span><span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: "arial"; font-size: 11pt; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">.” Nietzsche’s description of the demon’s proposal of eternal recurrence is an experiment to determine if we are psychologically capable of embracing life as it is, the present. Is it possible, dare I say, that this description of a full embrace of life as it is in the immediate present is experientially similar to the embrace of the God of grace and the acceptance of the eternal resounding washing away of all guilt and shame in Christ? Are these just different ways to describe one vital aspect of a spiritual awakening? Mind you, the totality of Nietzsche’s spirituality cannot be the same as that of the enlightened Christian, but what Nietzsche is describing as the orientation toward life and self necessary to embrace life “fervently”, is also necessary to what Christians call practicing the presence of God. Furthermore, what Nietzsche is critiquing is the debilitating toxin often administered through Christian theology that disables the human capacity to embrace Being as it is. </span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt; text-indent: 36pt;">
<span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: "arial"; font-size: 11pt; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">To embrace the present in this full bodied embrace is the embrace of both the responsibility that we are who we have made ourselves and the embrace of the reality that certain aspects of life happen to us, our fate. We have regrets as a result of our decisions and suffer injustice at the hands of cruel people and cruel fate. Yet, all this life-stuff must be accepted. I am who I am. I must courageously and honestly accept all that was, for it all is. Such acceptance is a prerequisite if I am to move into the present joyfully. All else is a rejection of either life or self. This process of acceptance of all that is requires a process of rigorous honesty and can take an instance or a lifetime or somewhere inbetween. We might think we are embracing life, but we have yet to accept ALL of who we are. We are suppressing these truths. We lack the courage to face that we both broke ourselves and have, to some extent, been broken by others. But this is what is. All that comes into this moment cannot be changed. All psychological self-loathing must be revealed and discarded, and the sources, the moments and history that created this self-rejection, must be embraced, accepted, and loved if I am to accept life as it is. I am the only subject that moves through this moment. The moralistic god must die, and the God of love and grace, of the cross, must rise in our consciousness if we are to embrace life. </span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt; text-indent: 36pt;">
<span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: "arial"; font-size: 11pt; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">I was a pastor once. Needless to say, I wasn’t good at preaching the party line. I developed a saying. I like sayings. The saying was as follows, “Bad religion is worse than no religion at all.” The sociological, political, ethical, psychological chasm between moralism and the religion of the God of grace is as wide a chasm as imaginable. In fact, Nietzsche is closer to the God of grace than the moralist, who judges himself, others, and the world according to a moral code that is ultimately life-rejecting. The moralist is constantly making plans for himself and others, placing moral prerequisites upon life that disqualify himself and others from actually living. Against this religion, this bad religion, I often find more camaraderie with Nietzsche than my fellow Christian confessors. </span></div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline" />bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.com16tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663932.post-63970133264726162512018-07-07T10:58:00.001-07:002018-07-07T10:58:33.779-07:00This is a test. I haven't used this site for a long time and I am just starting up again. <div>
Brad Hightower</div>
bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663932.post-71041941992411958822016-03-23T11:41:00.001-07:002016-03-23T12:11:07.112-07:00Live Blog of Hillary Clinton at Stanford on Counter Terrorism - 3-23-2106Live Blog: 3-23-2016<br />
<br />
12:10<br />
Overall an excellent speech. Intentionally wonky. Intentionally sophisticated in order to show that Cruz and trump are totally in over their heads.<br />
<br />
Implies how Obama represents true leadership. She explains well what real American leadership looks like. Partnering and not bullying.<br />
<br />
<br />
What doesn't work:<br />
<i>Clinton: It does not work to alienate Muslims in America. </i><br />
<i>She gives testimony of her experience. Explains how these Muslims are assets in the fight. </i><br />
<i>Cruz is wrong for demonizing Muslims. This blanket bigotry is dangerous. </i><br />
<i>Gives example of 1000 policeman in NYC. </i><br />
<br />
This is a strong argument. She is really pushing her knowledge. She is gaining steam. She is presidential and Cruz and Trump are not. Notice: She has not mentioned Sanders even once.<br />
<br />
<br />
12:10 Syrian refugees: Solution is the cease fire. Create safe areas for Syrians<br />
<i>"It would be wrong to shut our doors. Terrorists cannot intimidate us to abandon our values."</i><br />
<br />
The goal is to let the voters know that she understands how International relations works. She is showing how ignorant Trump and Cruz's comments have been.<br />
<br />
Clinton: <i>We need to revoke passports of those we know have joined IS.</i><br />
<i>Focus on hot spots: prisons, neighborhoods</i><br />
<br />
12:00<br />
Clinton: <i>"How high does the wall have to be to keep the internet out."</i><br />
<i>It would be a serious mistake to stumble into another ground war.</i><br />
<i>It would be a serious mistake to carpet bomb. Such talk makes it sound like in over head.</i><br />
<br />
Clearly, giving a candidate speech.<br />
Talking about importance of NATO and need to maintain partnerships and allies.<br />
Allies extend our reach.<br />
Clinton: <i>NATO provides bases. A huge strategic advantage that Moscow and Beijing cannot match</i><br />
<br />
Clinton:<i> If Mr trump gets his way it will be like "Christmas in the Kremlin." </i><br />
<br />
11:49 Three Part Plan:<br />
<i>1. Take out ISIS strong hold in Iraq and Syria. Intensify coalition. Step up support for local ground forces.</i><br />
<i>2. Take out the infrastructure..finances. Waging on-line battles.</i><br />
<i>3. Harden our defenses at home. Brussels demonstrates our weaknesses.</i><br />
<br />
<br />
Opening with Michael McFaul. @McFaul<br />
<br />
11:42 am Hillary starts talking about Chelsea's time at Stanford.<br />
<br />
11:45 Sec Clinton describes recent atrocities of ISIS. Uses the word genocide. Genocide against religious minorities.<br />
<br />bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.com8tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663932.post-89390714514580788692015-01-13T22:39:00.003-08:002015-01-13T22:43:22.589-08:00@allisforgiven<br />
<a href="https://twitter.com/allisforgiven_">@allisforgiven_</a><br />
<br />
<br />bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663932.post-16129123697390209412013-10-28T23:17:00.002-07:002013-10-28T23:19:22.406-07:00Populist Libertarianism – The Quest to Disarm the Morality of the Citizen<div class="MsoNormal">
<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><u>Populist
Libertarianism – The Quest to Disarm the Morality of the Citizen<o:p></o:p></u></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
The political dialogue in the United States is getting ever
more polarized. The rise of the “tea party” republicans in 2010 was a response
to many factors one certainly being a deep mistrust of the power of the state.
This libertarian, populist impulse opposes any expansion of the use of state
power. After arguing extensively for the use of the state to meet the needs of
people for both security and welfare, Michael Walzer, in <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Spheres of Justice</i>, makes a parenthetical statement, which I would
like to reflect and build upon. Walzer states, “[this] point [regarding the use
of state power] would hardly have to be made were it not for contemporary
advances of a minimal or libertarian state, who argue that all such matters
(except for defense) should be left to the voluntary efforts of individuals” (SOJ,
kindle 1542)<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Since 1983, when Walzer made this observation, the forward
march “of the minimal state” has been steady and drastic. What we have seen in
the subsequent decades, in the United States, is an “advancement” based on the
maxim that “government is not the solution to the problem; government is the
problem” (Pres. Ronald Reagan First Inaugural Address, January 20<sup>th</sup>,
1981). This idea has captured the political mind over a large segment of the
American political landscape and, in many ways, has infected the entire body
politic. My thesis is that this populist, libertarian ideology has resulted in
great confusion with respect to the state’s moral obligation to its citizens.
The effect of this ideology has been that the political process has been denied
entry into many spheres where the state through political discussion is the
appropriate instrument to undertake projects to meet the general and particular
needs of the citizenry. Furthermore, if distribution mechanisms, other than the
market, are ideologically weakened then those who monopolize money are
empowered to dominate these other spheres. Using the model developed by Michael
Walzer in “Spheres of Justice”, I will attempt to investigate the effects of
this populist, libertarian impulse in American political life and suggest
alternative distribution criterion, which are more appropriate to each given
good. My aim is to convince the libertarian in all of us that the state is
often the necessary instrument with which to more justly distribute key primary
goods.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">Applying the Walzer’s
Model to a Critique of Libertarianism<o:p></o:p></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
To begin this analysis, I must first define libertarianism
as it is being utilized in the American political discussion by its proponents.
I do not think I will get much disagreement by saying libertarianism is a
philosophy of government that limits government’s role to its minimum. Often
this minimum is limited to the defense of the citizens from enemies within and
without. Secondly, I define libertarianism as populist. By populist, I mean
that it caters to the self-interests of an idealized definition of ordinary
people. In its populist guise, this ideology maintains an anti-elitist stance.
But because it is libertarian, this ideology serves the interests of the wealthiest
Americans by undermining the power of the state to limit the dominance of money
in various spheres. In this sense, populist libertarianism is a type of
false-consciousness in which ordinary people champion an ideology which does
not align with their own self-interests. <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">Why the State Comes
into Being<o:p></o:p></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Walzer’s depiction of the function of the state seems
somewhat irrefutable. Human beings find strength in numbers. Security is the
first need of the population. The state arises in order to meet this security
need. Because the security needs of the population are so great and ever
present, the state is granted the right to compel able-bodied men to fight.
This is the fundamental social contract. Like the Hobbesian calculus, we give
the state coercive power in exchange for the security of the population. For
the libertarian, this limited social contract becomes a vision for the ideal
state. To the libertarian, to cede to the state coercive powers other than
those needed to combat these limited security needs is to grant the state
tyrannical powers. But when looking at historical examples of the role of the
state, we simply do not see such an arbitrary limitation of the state’s
coercive powers. In other words, such an ideology is nice in theory, but, in
actual practice, such limitations are unreasonable and destructive to political
discourse. <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Instead, Walzer does not limit the role of the state to “defense”
but to “needs”. “The criterion of need becomes a critical standard” (Kindle
location, 1409). Nonetheless, it must be understood that “needs are elusive”
and “expansive” (Kindle location, 1394). What is meant by “elusive” and
“expansive” is that each particular setting will define needs particularly. A
simple example is public health. It is commonly recognized that infectious
diseases are a public enemy. Therefore, in the United States there are
mandatory immunizations laws which require vaccination of children prior to
entrance into the public schools. Compulsory vaccination is not beyond the
police powers of the state. This example shows that to limit state power to
defense on the basis of a philosophic ideal provides an absurd limitation in
practical application. The morality of actual cultures cannot reasonably submit
to the libertarian ideal. <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Nonetheless, the libertarian mantra continues to hold sway
even in the realm of public health. A movement, at the grass roots level, is
prevalent in the United States against compulsory vaccinations. This sentiment
feeds upon a belief that the state has no right to compel an <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">individual</i> to take a medicine. The
ideology of libertarianism is empowered by the American sentiment which
idealizes individualism and a patriotism which stands up against the tyranny of
the state. The self-identified American patriot feels violated when the state
forces a needle in his shoulder. Even so, sentiment is not the same as moral
clarity. To apply such populist sentiment to the sphere of public health is
morally confused. There is no moral distinction that can be made between
serving one’s country by willingly responding to a compulsory draft and willingly
responding to one’s civic duties with respect to compulsory immunization. The
clarification, which Walzer makes, is to set the criterion for the use of state
powers at “need” and not merely “defense”. Subsequently, when the state uses
its powers to meet these general needs, in this case the need for public
health, the liberties of the individual will be sacrificed. The political
process is essentially a practical discussion concerning what we, the citizens,
decide are the needs which we are willing to use state powers to meet. The
paradigm of maximizing personal liberty by limiting the state to mere defense
is not beneficial to a reasonable populace.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
The control of infectious diseases is an extreme example to
show that the state is granted coercive powers to fight public enemies <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">and</i> meet general needs. Other examples
might include protection from fire, protection of the environment, the
regulation of pharmaceutical drugs and other consumer protections. If I take a
walk around my block, I find innumerable examples where the state has used its
tax authority to meet needs, which I cannot imagine any reasonable citizen
would complain about. I walk on a <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">street</i></b> by a <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">school</i></b>. I see <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">electrical
power lines</i></b> bringing electricity to every home. I am drinking a cup of <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">safe
drinking water</i></b>. I remember as a youth having to come inside due to
extreme air pollution. When I tell my children about the feeling of smog filled
lungs and difficulty breathing, they find my story hard to believe. My
commitment to the American way of life is not merely a commitment to procedural
freedoms like freedom of the press or the right to vote or run for office, but
also a thankfulness for the well-being I experience as a result of the
legislative victories which have enabled us as citizens to meet our general
needs in such a particularly effective manner. As citizens, our loyalties to
the American political process ought not to only celebrate the past, for needs
are elusive and expansive. As history unfolds, new needs arise and new
challenges present themselves. <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">Economic Catastrophe<o:p></o:p></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
The above analysis of the role of the state has supported
the application of a broad conception of the state’s coercive power in order to
meet the general needs of the citizenry. In times of economic catastrophe, the
needs of the population expand. The libertarian ideology seeks to limit the
states response in the midst of such catastrophes. This libertarian agenda to delegitimize
the role of the state to coercively extract resources from citizens of means in
order to provide for citizens in need does not align with the morality of the
American citizenry. By legitimizing the needs of citizens in times of economic
crisis, the power of the state to use its tax authority to meet these needs is
likewise legitimized. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">Economic Catastrophe
and Acts of God <o:p></o:p></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
The financial crisis of 2008 reveals additional enemies
which threaten the availability of numerous necessary goods. When a hurricane
ravages a coastal community leaving tens of thousands homeless, the nation
provides assistance. Such an event is termed an act of God. This terminology is
used to illustrate that those who suffer are not suffering on account of their
own lack of character or poor choices. Hurricanes are indiscriminate. So too,
an economic disaster harms individuals both severely and indiscriminately. The
economic contraction of 2007-2009 resulted in the loss of 8-9 million jobs and
over $6 trillion dollars in middle class housing wealth. Surely, a factory
worker in California is not to blame for the decisions of a banker in New York
or a policymaker in Washington. There remains controversy over the actual
causes of the recession, but there surely ought to be consensus that a
construction worker in San Diego or a car dealer in Iowa is being harmed by
powers beyond her control. As Americans, we are averse to providing for a
persons needs when their condition is self-inflicted, but unemployment during
an economic catastrophe is no more self-inflicted that the damage done to a
home as the result of a natural disaster. In the same way that the Federal
Government declares a natural disaster in order to provide relief to victim of
an earthquake in California or a flood in Missouri, so too a society can
experience an economic disaster which requires drastic actions by the Federal
Government. <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
As Walzer stated above, “this point would hardly have to be
made were it not for contemporary advances of [champions of] a minimal or
libertarian state”, but in fact there remains champions of just such a state. As
I have shown, this libertarian ideology is not morally cohesive. Unemployment
in the midst of an economic catastrophe requires a state response. It is our
moral obligation to come to the rescue of our fellow citizens who suffer as the
result of something that they have no power to prevent. A vigorous response to
meet the needs of our neighbor citizens is a moral obligation. In order to meet
these moral obligations, we act as citizens. The only means to make this
response is to tax citizens of means lest we create additional hardship. What
is in question then is the precise nature of the state’s response. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Having determined that our fellow citizens have legitimate
needs during such an economic crisis, it is important to define their actual
need. Picture a husband and father with two small children. He is an engineer
by trade. During the economic crisis, the company that employed him could not
get working capital. The company went bankrupt. Such a scenario, with slightly
different details, happened literally millions of times during the great
recession of 2007-2009. What do these men and women need? Do they need food?
Yes. Do they need continued income support to pay their mortgages? Yes. Do they
need dignity and the opportunity to work? Yes. What these men or women need are
jobs. Having clarity with respect to our moral obligations to one another and
what needs are to be met affects our policy decisions. In such situations,
America has traditionally provided massive stimulus projects. The government
goes to work employing millions and makes good use of the available skills and
labor to invest in our nation. In such a situation, nothing is more disabling
to our moral agency than the idea that “government is not the solution to the
problem; government is the problem”. <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
<o:AllowPNG/>
</o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
</xml><![endif]-->
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:TrackMoves/>
<w:TrackFormatting/>
<w:PunctuationKerning/>
<w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
<w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
<w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
<w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
<w:DoNotPromoteQF/>
<w:LidThemeOther>EN-US</w:LidThemeOther>
<w:LidThemeAsian>JA</w:LidThemeAsian>
<w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript>
<w:Compatibility>
<w:BreakWrappedTables/>
<w:SnapToGridInCell/>
<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
<w:DontGrowAutofit/>
<w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark/>
<w:EnableOpenTypeKerning/>
<w:DontFlipMirrorIndents/>
<w:OverrideTableStyleHps/>
<w:UseFELayout/>
</w:Compatibility>
<m:mathPr>
<m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math"/>
<m:brkBin m:val="before"/>
<m:brkBinSub m:val="--"/>
<m:smallFrac m:val="off"/>
<m:dispDef/>
<m:lMargin m:val="0"/>
<m:rMargin m:val="0"/>
<m:defJc m:val="centerGroup"/>
<m:wrapIndent m:val="1440"/>
<m:intLim m:val="subSup"/>
<m:naryLim m:val="undOvr"/>
</m:mathPr></w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="true"
DefSemiHidden="true" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99"
LatentStyleCount="276">
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="0" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Normal"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="heading 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 7"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 8"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 9"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 7"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 8"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 9"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="35" QFormat="true" Name="caption"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="10" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Title"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" Name="Default Paragraph Font"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="11" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtitle"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="22" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Strong"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="20" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Emphasis"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="59" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Table Grid"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Placeholder Text"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="No Spacing"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Revision"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="34" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="List Paragraph"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="29" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Quote"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="30" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Quote"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="19" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Emphasis"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="21" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Emphasis"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="31" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Reference"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="32" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Reference"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="33" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Book Title"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="37" Name="Bibliography"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" QFormat="true" Name="TOC Heading"/>
</w:LatentStyles>
</xml><![endif]-->
<!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:Cambria;
mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<!--StartFragment-->
<span style="font-family: Cambria; font-size: 12.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-ascii-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-bidi; mso-fareast-font-family: "MS 明朝"; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-fareast; mso-hansi-theme-font: minor-latin;">So what have we discovered by using Walzer’s
model to define the role of government? We have determined that the role of the
state is to meet the needs of the people. Defining the type of need and the
appropriate degree of “need” is the content of political discussion. We put the
libertarian ideal of a state limited to its minimal role of defense to the test
and found that in real life settings this ideal is impractical and
unreasonable. When applying libertarianism to the situation of economic
catastrophe, we have revealed that, in fact, libertarianism is morally
indefensible. In summary, as citizens we have a duty to ourselves to understand
the ways in which government has provided for the well being of the American
people through a myriad of projects which provide the foundation of American
prosperity. Only by understanding our own particular history and the successful
ways we have acted to provide for the needs of our citizenry can we combat the
false ideologies which only serve to confuse our minds and undermine our collective
will</span><!--EndFragment-->
bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663932.post-50727260059202391052012-11-28T17:07:00.002-08:002012-11-28T17:08:18.718-08:00More on John Rawls and the Enlightenment<a href="http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/3342972/Frazer_RawlsEnlightenments.pdf?sequence=2" target="_blank">John Rawls - Between Two Enlightenments</a>bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663932.post-85596752010930501872012-11-27T20:05:00.000-08:002012-11-27T20:19:36.082-08:00John Rawls: A Theory of Justice Part 1 - The Enlightenment ExperimentAdmittedly, I am late to the table concerning John Rawls, but I am becoming quite the fan. I am currently reading "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Theory_of_Justice" target="_blank">A Theory of Justice</a>" having read, earlier this year, "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Law_of_Peoples" target="_blank">The Law of Peoples</a>". <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhSGZqB9K-H64n-o7xh_KDJiy05CCfOGQaCJHFO8DuPg4nld5JDbuVc2Hq5VkT04AigFv2CiF2sWF1wcz95PbIwvdf-OURRXNTNclYaE2RzKz-bYnfVVooo1o9d3dIhsUtpqOjS/s1600/Theory.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhSGZqB9K-H64n-o7xh_KDJiy05CCfOGQaCJHFO8DuPg4nld5JDbuVc2Hq5VkT04AigFv2CiF2sWF1wcz95PbIwvdf-OURRXNTNclYaE2RzKz-bYnfVVooo1o9d3dIhsUtpqOjS/s200/Theory.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
What I will be doing is journaling my thoughts as I read this monumental work of moral philosophy. My audience for much of what I write is the American evangelical but also more broadly the American electorate. Having studied a bit of Rawls this year, I am coming to the conclusion that Rawls should be mandatory reading for all Americans, probably best as college freshmen. Of course, such a suggestion is merely wishful thinking, but one can hope that the American electorate could become well informed and thoughtful in light of the irrationality that marked the 2012 election cycle. <br />
<br />
Rawls is a Newtonian figure in the realm of political philosophy. What Newton was to modern physics I believe Rawls is to moral and political philosophy. Rawls makes all things clear when considering how political life ought to work, which brings me to my first point. Johns Rawls is a pillar in the endless line of splendor that is the enlightenment tradition. <br />
<br />
The enlightenment is based on the idea that through reason mankind can discover the path to ever increasing peace and prosperity. The works of John Rawls and especially "A Theory of Justice" lays forth a methodology by which men and women of reason may discover a conception of justice upon which they can agree. Such a conception of justice becomes the foundation of a well ordered society and, thus, such a program becomes a step forward in the enlightenment experiment. I find such an appeal to reason glorious and dignifying. The vision of the enlightenment can be quite motivational, but likewise, to lose the vision and quest of the enlightenment can be quite disheartening. Such a cynicism rooted in a rejection of the enlightenment principles that assume solutions to fundamental problems can be solved at least partially leads to political and social apathy. The study of Rawls can be a means to overcome such apathy, but it seems that to find inspiration from Rawls, we must first address two obstacles. <br />
<br />
First, the enlightenment experiment involves faith in reason. There then is the problem of man's political nature. In our current political and social environment, partisanism appears to be undermining the role of reason in the decisions of the various political actors. Would a reading of the likes of Rawls by the American electorate tip the scales from purely political considerations in the decisions of political actors to a more principle-based problem solving founded on a common conception of justice. Needless to say, a more principled and thoughtful politics would be welcomed. A reading of Rawls can help us embrace such a quest for public reasoning based on a common conception of justice. <br />
<br />
While the obstacle of our political tendencies poses a threat to a more enlightened approach to our political life, our cultures post-modern tendencies likewise poses an obstacle. By post-modern, I mean the belief that all opinions are equal. Ought not an opinion which is based in fantasy as opposed to fact be discredited in the marketplace of ideas, yet it appears of late that such a naive proposition is not a given. In fact, the reality that a fantasy based opinion can survive public discourse is a threat to the enlightenment experiment that is liberal democracy. But maybe just maybe, an appeal to education, indeed an education in the writings of John Rawls and the like, might just give a shot in the arm to our ailing experiment. bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.com10tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663932.post-66801472966132176712012-11-12T15:26:00.000-08:002012-11-12T15:26:16.691-08:00The Need for a New Theological and Political WineskinLast night, I heard a theologian teach at our church. He started by saying he was very depressed because we are losing the war for evangelical Christianity in America. Needless to say, his depression had to have something to do with the election. He tried to hide his partisanship but it leaked through. <br />
<br />
He was absolutely horrible, but I am heartened. He was an old man, and I think he represents an old way of thinking. At least I can hope. <br />
<br />
This theologians point was that Christians need to learn how to think and persuade people to our way of thinking. He decried the anti-intellectualism in the church. He completely missed the point. The problem is not that we do not think enough. The problem is that the conservative evangelical theological system makes people anti-intellectual. The problem is that any theology which purports that the earth is 10,000 years old cannot be intellectual. What is needed is a new theological framework, a new wineskin to hold the wine of scientific FACTS. If we cannot reasonably and elegantly address the facts, then we cannot be intellectual or thinking people. The problem is that the 20th century conservative hermeneutic is not capable of addressing scientific fact. Therefore, a new hermeneutic is needed, a new wineskin. <br />
<br />
This theologian was forlorn about the votes on homosexual marriage. If we cannot support equal rights and liberty for ALL, then we cannot have a place at the table of democracy. We need a new political philosophy that shows a compassionate and grace filled face to the Church in the political arena. It is so obvious that Christians are supposed to be the voice for the poor in America. Instead, we are seen as people who believe that what is on God's mind is the idea that homosexuals want rights under the law. In a democracy, it is fine to believe that BUT it is not the basis of a political philosophy. The American political system is founded on the motto of e pluribus unum. The American experiment is an experiment centered on belief that the a diversity of peoples can become one people. This political philosophy by definition must not bring our religion into our politics. Unless we develop a political philosophy based in a commitment to civil liberties and a passion for justice, we cannot be intellectuals in the realm of politics. <br />
<br />
What this theologian didn't realize is that what created the anti-intellectualism is the inability of his generations theology to incorporate scientific facts and to understand the relationship between religion and politics under our constitutional democracy. What is needed is better ideas not doubling down on the failed ideas of 20th century evangelicalism. bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663932.post-30145988418055554762012-10-04T11:42:00.003-07:002012-10-04T11:51:28.872-07:00Presidential Debate Obama / Romney: What President Obama Should Have Said<span style="font-family: Calibri;">I am a firm believer that democratic ideas are the solution
to the current economic problems. That democrats have the
solution to economic problems is certainly not always the case. To articulate
the democratic ideas on the economy, this is what President Obama should have
said. </span><br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<span style="font-family: Calibri;">During the first debate session, Romney and Obama went back
and forth on reducing taxes for businesses with Romney stating the 50% of
American workers work for successful small companies whose taxes would go up
under President Obama’s plan. These companies, Romney strongly asserted, are
the job creators. Romney then re-iterated the Republican talking point that the
Obama administration is penalizing success. To this line of reasoning Obama had
no answer. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<span style="font-family: Calibri;">Here is the correct answer which the President could have
made. I would have said the following:</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">The problem with Governor Ronmey's one size fits all, supply side solution is
that he states what appears on the surface to be a valid point but is simply bad
policy in the current economic environment. Today, corporations small and large
are holding onto a record level of cash. To lower tax rates on these companies
will give companies better after taxes cash on hand, and only add to the record cash on hand that companies are already not spending on growth and hiring. The problem is that
companies are not spending because they do not have enough demand from consumers
to grow their businesses by spending more money. The reason for this is because
Republican policies over the last 30 years, supply side economics, have
funneled money to the top income brackets and left the middle-class squeezed
and buried. Therefore, in order to increase demand for goods and services and
grow the economy from the middle out ALL tax decreases need to be focused on
the middle-class. We are in a economic situation, caused by republican supply
side blind-ideology, which has consistently reduced the buying power of the
middle-class. Therefore, let me say this again 100%, ALL, tax relief in my
proposal is focused on the middle class . Again, to grow the economy from the inside out, we must focus ALL our
tax relief on the middle-class so that they can energize economic growth
through increased consumption.</span></i></b></div>
bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.com8tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663932.post-45214871597751651792012-10-01T14:20:00.000-07:002012-10-02T05:48:02.627-07:00Discipleship – Intro: Discipleship and the Need for a Spiritual Revolution<span style="mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;"><strong>SPIRITUAL
REVOLUTION</strong></span></span></span><br />
<span style="mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span class="text"><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;">When I first started writing
publically about the church, I started this blog, “21<sup>st</sup> Century
Reformation”. That was 2003 or about 10 years ago. In those years, the emphasis
was simply to take seriously the teachings of Jesus and to apply them in a
practical way. I was pastoring a church and later participated in a church
plant. Both communities evolved into something that, in light of my reading of
the scripture, did not look like the early church. Many of my friends
encouraged me to meet people half way and to be more “realistic”. The last few
years I have tried that half-measured approach for myself, and I have found
this road does not make me happy. Therefore, today I return to my first love
and am beginning a new quest to walk a road of continual spiritual revolution. Personally,
my heart will only find its home in the midst of a community committed to this spiritual
revolution.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Let the journey and the
struggle begin anew. <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
<span class="text"><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;"><strong></strong></span></span><br />
<span class="text"><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;"><strong>God
Plan for Human Community Remains the Same</strong></span></span></div>
<span class="text"><span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: minor-latin;"><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
<em><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span class="text"><span style="mso-ascii-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: minor-latin;"><sup>42 </sup></span></span><span style="mso-ascii-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: minor-latin;">They were continually devoting
themselves to the apostles’ teaching and to fellowship, to the breaking of
bread and to prayer<sup>43 </sup>Everyone kept feeling a sense of awe; and many
wonders and signs were taking place through the apostles.</span> <span class="text"><sup>44 </sup>And
all those who had believed<sup>]</sup>were together and had all things in
common;</span> <span class="text"><sup>45 </sup>and they <span style="mso-bidi-font-style: italic;">began</span> selling their property and possessions and were sharing
them with all, as anyone might have need.</span> <span class="text"><sup>46 </sup>Day
by day continuing with one mind in the temple, and breaking bread from house to
house, they were taking their meals together with gladness and sincerity of
heart,</span> <span class="text"><sup>47 </sup>praising God and having favor with
all the people. And the Lord was adding to their number day by day those who
were being saved.</span><o:p></o:p></span></span></em></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;">And again in Acts chapter 4, the church is described as<em> “<span style="font-size: small;"><span class="text"><sup>32 </sup>And the congregation
of those who believed were of one heart and soul; and not one <span style="mso-bidi-font-style: italic;">of them </span>claimed that anything
belonging to him was his own, but all things were common property to them.</span>
<span class="text"><sup>33 </sup>And with great power the apostles were giving
testimony to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and abundant grace was upon
them all.</span> <span class="text"><sup>34 </sup>For there was not a needy
person among them, for all who were owners of land or houses would sell them
and bring the proceeds of the sales</span> <span class="text"><sup>35 </sup>and
lay them at the apostles’ feet, and they would be distributed to each as any
had need.</span></span></em></span></span></div>
</span><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
<br /></div>
</span><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
<span class="text"><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;">The biblical description of the early
church depicts a community that is both spiritual and revolutionary. Can this
be said of the church today? Is the church spiritual? Martin Lloyd-Jones, one
of the greatest preachers of the 20<sup>th</sup> Century, described the
church’s greatest problem as “superficiality”. Is not superficiality in
opposition to spirituality? Spirituality seeks to heal what really ails us. A
healthy spiritual community develops a spiritual program that helps others find
this healing, this freedom, this truly happy and heavenly quality of life. Are
today’s Christians distinctly more spiritually healthy and beautiful than the non-Christian?
Are our behaviors and attitudes distinct? <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Would the on-looker describe the peace and
endurance of the modern Christian as stunning and awesome? If not, then, we are
not yet spiritual. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">
</span><span class="text"><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;"></span></span><br />
<span class="text"><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;">Likewise, would anyone describe the
church of today as revolutionary? The early church lived communally, “<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">had all things in common</i>”. “<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">There was not a needy person among them, for
all who had lands or houses would sell them…and they would distribute to each
as any had need</i>”. Does this describe the church today? Is not the church a
staunch defender of the status quo? Is the church meeting the material needs of
the world in a revolutionary way? Is materialism a problem in the church as it
is in the world? Is simplicity the norm? Is our generosity extravagant? Is the
church revolutionary like the early church was? <o:p></o:p></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">
</span><br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
<span class="text"><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;">By revolutionary, I mean a community
that is living by an entirely different set of ethical rules than the world
around us. To be revolutionary always requires a revolutionary relationships
with material goods and a revolutionary concern for others. This is exactly
what is described in the early church. Plainly, poverty and inequality is a
problem in the world and always has been. This problem of inequality was solved
in the revolutionary lifestyle of the early church. We cannot call ourselves a
biblical community unless we are similarly living a revolutionary lifestyle. </span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
<span class="text"><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;">The church is neither radically
spiritual nor radically revolutionary, and, unless we become both spiritual and
revolutionary, we cannot be the solution to the human problem. Yet, this is
exactly what it means that Jesus is the Christ and that we are His disciples.
Jesus came to solve the human problem of injustice and man’s inhumanity to man,
and this solution is to be shining forth in the church. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">
</span><span class="text"><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;"></span></span><br />
<span class="text"><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;">What the world needs is a spiritual
revolution. Our spirituality must set us truly free, and this freedom must
express itself in a distinctly Christlike ethical response to the world we
encounter. Our world is drowning in injustice and in need of a people free
enough to make personal material sacrifices which meet this injustice with
compassion and empathy. <o:p></o:p></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">
</span><br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
<span class="text"><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;">The early church is a description of
the prototype of the church as fashioned by the disciples of Jesus. These men
and women, discipled in the footsteps of Jesus, lived radically distinct lives
filled with spiritual power and material generosity. The early church lived in
a state of spiritual revolution bringing a revolutionary lifestyle of worship,
prayer and simplicity to a world filled with violence and poverty. Until the
church looks like the early church, we will not change the world like the early
church changed the world. Until the church makes disciples like Jesus made
disciples, the church will not look like the community of the disciples of
Jesus. </span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
<span class="text"><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;">It is not time to move the deck chairs
on the Titanic. It is time for a spiritual revolution. </span></span></div>
</span></span><br />bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.com12tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663932.post-39722966234875274672012-09-25T07:43:00.001-07:002012-09-25T07:44:33.131-07:00As Clinton sounds interest rate alarm, a Warning Against a Do-Nothing Congress<br />
<a href="http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/09/24/14071974-as-clinton-sounds-interest-rate-alarm-does-congress-think-its-for-real?lite">As Clinton sounds interest rate alarm, will reason prevail?</a><br />
The cost of politics as usual is very high. If Congress takes the stance that the best politics is to assure that the other guys fail, real people will get hurt.bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663932.post-14328230862355027382012-09-24T12:20:00.001-07:002012-09-24T15:10:00.162-07:00Fiddling at the Fire by Nouriel Roubini - Project SyndicateAfter compiling all the elements of the future perfect storm leading to potential global depression, Roubini states the cause:<br />
<br />
<em>Ineffective governments with weak leadership are at the root of the problem. In democracies, repeated elections lead to short-term policy choices. In autocracies like China and Russia, leaders resist the radical reforms that would reduce the power of entrenched lobbies and interests, thereby fueling social unrest as resentment against corruption and rent-seeking boils over into protest.</em> <em>But, as everyone kicks the can down the road, the can is getting heavier and, in the major emerging markets and advanced economies alike, is approaching a brick wall. Policymakers can either crash into that wall, or they can show the leadership and vision needed to dismantle it safely.</em> <br />
<br />
This confirms the fundamental truth that problems can be solved. All problems have solutions, but, as is so often the case, the primary players' political agendas trump reason. <a href="http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/fiddling-at-the-fire-by-nouriel-roubini">Fiddling at the Fire by Nouriel Roubini - Project Syndicate</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663932.post-981936264945224862012-03-15T05:30:00.001-07:002012-03-15T05:30:01.294-07:00Ugandans react with anger to Kony video | Al Jazeera Blogs<a href="http://blogs.aljazeera.com/africa/2012/03/14/ugandans-react-anger-kony-video">Ugandans react with anger to Kony video | Al Jazeera Blogs</a>bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663932.post-29434241206202813452011-12-22T05:51:00.000-08:002011-12-22T05:52:23.082-08:00Violence Returns to Iraq - democracy and Military Action<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/22/world/meast/iraq-violence/index.html?hpt=hp_t1">Wave of attacks kills dozens amid Iraq's upheaval</a><br />
<div>
The lesson here is to reassess how democracy promotion works. We cannot expect to be successful by enforcing democracy via military action. The entire endevor may prove to have been a total waste of lives and money. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Lesson learned: Empire isn't a good long term strategy for prosperity. </div>bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663932.post-7414945455315945752011-12-10T18:42:00.000-08:002011-12-10T18:45:49.893-08:00Bias Justice in Alabama: Executive arrested under Alabama immigration law<a href="http://slatest.slate.com/posts/2011/11/21/mercedes_benz_executive_arrested_under_alabama_immigration_law.html">Mercedes-Benz executive arrested under Alabama immigration law</a><br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
A basic premise of justice is that justice must be without bias. Laws cannot favor the poor or the rich. No one is above the law. This principle of justice, obviously, is not understood by the good people of Alabama where a law is being reconsidered because it has been found to possibly harm rich folk. </div>
<div>
Would a false arrest of a spanish speaking tax paying maid lead to the over turn of a law in Alabama or must the person falsely arrested be rich? The answer is obvious. Poor brown skinned people have been complaining about this law and others like it for months, BUT, as it turns out, the long arm of the law is only comfortable reaching downward. </div>
<div>
This case is a perfect example of bias and, therefore, an unjust law which should be overturned regardless of who is being falsely arrested. </div>bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663932.post-54473237622333010892011-12-03T10:29:00.000-08:002011-12-03T10:30:54.676-08:00US Lawmaker Blocking Obama’s Pick for Ambassador to Russia<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/national-security/senator-blocking-obamas-pick-for-ambassador-to-russia-over-missile-defense-concerns/2011/12/02/gIQAbJDxJO_story.html">US lawmaker blocking Obama’s pick for ambassador</a><br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Michael McFaul is the most clear eyed observer of Russia on the planet. He has legitimate pro-democracy street cred. If anyone thinks Mike will be fooled by Putin, they are either ignorant of Dr. McFaul's history or they simply are being disingenuous. You choose. </div>bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663932.post-18695342386613133732011-12-03T09:59:00.000-08:002011-12-03T10:01:42.451-08:00Is Modern Capitalism Sustainable? - Kenneth Rogoff - Project Syndicate<a href="http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/rogoff87/English">Is Modern Capitalism Sustainable?</a><br />
<div>
<a href="http://www.project-syndicate.org/author_photo/f/a/a/3355_thumb.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://www.project-syndicate.org/author_photo/f/a/a/3355_thumb.jpg" /></a>As we think about "The Kingdom as Justice", it is helpful to take a self-critical look at our understanding of the world's political economy. What about our political-economic system is unjust? How are people and future generations harmed by a lack of care for the economy, the environment and our debt burden? Is it not unjust to leave a world of inequality, pollution, debt and rising health care costs to our children to fix? Certainly God cares about the well being of our children and has his sights on the well being of our children's children. Can inequality continue to go unchecked? The question is how do we fix these problems that are quickly evolving into crisis due to our petty self-interests and our lack of intellectual rigor.</div>
<div>
In the above article, Kenneth Rogoff begins to ask questions concerning the sustainability of capitalism in its current form. We too need to look objectively and without bias (especially religious bias) at how to solve these policy problems which are at the heart of the problems of injustice in God's world. </div>bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663932.post-1916236208463591012011-11-23T21:20:00.000-08:002011-12-03T10:35:28.885-08:00John Rawls - Required Reading<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Rawls">John Rawls</a><br />
<div>
It seems only reasonable to me that such great thinkers like John Rawls should be required reading for all Christian leaders AND that the church should be a central place for public reasoning. </div>bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663932.post-32119662650635525482011-11-08T21:49:00.000-08:002011-12-03T10:35:58.034-08:00Did the Poor Cause the Crisis?It is hard to resist posting an article like this one. Justice compels me. <br />
<div>
Been meditating on justice a lot lately. </div>bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663932.post-88899053708052600032011-09-25T20:37:00.000-07:002011-12-03T10:36:18.535-08:00Why Greece is so Important - Bailouts and HaircutsDiscussion of <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/23/us-greece-haircuts-medai-idUSTRE78M1LI20110923">Greece proposing the possibility of 50 percent haircut on debt</a> is a very important news item. For a Christian blogger to speak so much about economics might seem strange to some but consider 20th Century Europe's history of financial meltdowns. <br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
First, I think Europe needs to take action to allow peripheral countries an orderly default. The longer the global community waits the greater the risk. My understanding of an orderly default is basically an agreed upon haircut. Banks holding Greek debt agree to write the value down and Greece agrees to pay the new payments on the new debt levels. Though a 50pc haircut seems drastic think about the options of more austerity. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Populations like Greece at some point will rebel against further austerity. Political unrest in Europe is the worst case scenario. Unrest will likely lead to a populist call for a disorderly default. The contagion of such action is completely unpredictable and likely to be more catastrophic than Lehman. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Why is this important? 1. Good policy and orderly cooperative action can avoid total catastrophe. It is vital to realize that while a natural catastrophe like a Tsunami cannot be avoided Financial Tsunamis can be avoided. The math can be done to make a balanced bailout and haircut options that equally effects banks and public services but protects all of us from wholesale disaster. As Christians, we ought to call for balanced sacrifice and wise solutions to avoid undue suffering. This is the compassionate and wise thing to do. 2. Human nature and the realities of life can cause suffering people to do horrible things. Poverty and economic collapse can lead to political instability. These things have happened before and it is unwise to believe that the 21st century is any different than the 20th. </div>bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663932.post-68349602788738724522011-09-02T12:45:00.000-07:002011-09-02T12:45:19.386-07:00India's Identity Project<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/02/world/asia/02india.html?_r=1&hp">With National Database, India Tries to Reach the Poor - NYTimes.com</a>
<br />
<br />This is a great article about the India Identity Project. This is a project to register all Indians. India is notorious for leaving its despertely poor behind as it "develops". This project is an aim to monitor and measure the lives of the poor and be able to get these suffering people into the benefits process. The aim is to lower significantly corruption and the cost of India's bearocracy. This is great use of technology to move development forward.
<br />
<br />It is also headed by the author of Imagining India, Nandan M. Nilekani. Imagining India is on my bed stand waiting to be read.
<br />bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663932.post-73108131722506805882011-09-01T22:08:00.000-07:002011-12-03T10:37:20.558-08:00Currently Reading @ 21st Century Reformation<a href="http://bks2.books.google.com/books?id=LFk3pHpFiG4C&printsec=frontcover&img=1&zoom=1" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://bks2.books.google.com/books?id=LFk3pHpFiG4C&printsec=frontcover&img=1&zoom=1" /></a><a href="http://img2.imagesbn.com/images/28100000/28103874.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://img2.imagesbn.com/images/28100000/28103874.JPG" width="133" /></a><br />
My current reading list on the side bar is a bit outdated I need to update BUT here is what I am reading:<br />
<br />
1. I just finished <br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0195373383/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_sr_1?pf_rd_p=486539851&pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe-1&pf_rd_t=201&pf_rd_i=0195311450&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=1MMB586MBSTWD3VCYSN9">The Bottom Billion - Paul Collier</a><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; color: black;">2. I am now reading </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; color: black;"></span><a href="http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_ss_i_1_37?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=development+as+freedom+by+amartya+sen&sprefix=development+as+freedom+by+amartya+sen">Development as Freedom - Amartya Sen</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Both are fantastic...highly recommended.bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663932.post-27500679003417814532011-08-28T19:06:00.000-07:002011-08-28T19:06:47.604-07:00Development or Charity<br />
<div style="font: 12.0px Arial; margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px; text-decoration: underline;"><b>The Christian Obligation to Be Generous to the Poor</b></span></div>
<div style="font: 12.0px Arial; margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">Of all the teachings of Jesus certainly laboring for the well being of the poor is of the most central. Any student of Jesus has to be struck by the ethic of sacrificial love and extravagant giving. Consider this teaching recorded in Luke 12:</span></div>
<div style="font: 12.0px Arial; margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; min-height: 14.0px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;"></span></div>
<div style="font: 12.0px Arial; margin: 0.0px 0.0px 16.0px 0.0px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;"><b><i>29 And do not seek what you will eat and what you will drink, and do not keep worrying. 30 For all these things the nations of the world eagerly seek; but your Father knows that you need these things. 31 But seek His kingdom, and these things will be added to you. 32 Do not be afraid, little flock, for your Father has chosen gladly to give you the kingdom.33 “Sell your possessions and give to charity; make yourselves money belts which do not wear out, an unfailing treasure in heaven, where no thief comes near nor moth destroys. 34 For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.</i></b></span></div>
<div style="font: 12.0px Arial; margin: 0.0px 0.0px 16.0px 0.0px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">In my own contemplation of Jesus, one of the most compelling aspects of Jesus is that more than anyone else Jesus challenges me to serve the poor. Many other passages of the New Testament challenge the follower of Jesus concerning our obligation to generosity. 1 John 3:16-18 commands the Christians, </span></div>
<div style="font: 12.0px Arial; margin: 0.0px 0.0px 16.0px 0.0px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;"><b><i>16 We know love by this, that He laid down His life for us; and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren. 17 But whoever has the world’s goods, and sees his brother in need and closes his heart against him, how does the love of God abide in him? 18 Little children, let us not love with word or with tongue, but in deed and truth.</i></b></span></div>
<div style="font: 12.0px Arial; margin: 0.0px 0.0px 16.0px 0.0px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">Clearly, the Christian is to live by different set of values than those who are not followers of Jesus. As Christians, we are to use any discretionary resources to alleviate the suffering of others as opposed to our own luxury and pleasure. While we are called to serve the poor and suffering of the world, the question remains how ought we to go about doing this. </span></div>
<div style="font: 12.0px Arial; margin: 0.0px 0.0px 16.0px 0.0px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">Many churches have food pantries. Many churches give to emergency relief funds. Is this the limit of our obligation? Are we merely to give charity and supply for the destitute emergency needs.</span></div>
<div style="font: 12.0px Arial; margin: 0.0px 0.0px 16.0px 0.0px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">While we are commanded as followers of Jesus to demonstrate our faith in the love of God by being generous, we are often troubled by the observation that often charity in the form of aid is ineffective. This observation that often charity might actually do harm is quite demotivating. The question of how we are to help and serve the destitute can be answered if we consider the difference between development and charity. </span></div>
<div style="font: 12.0px Arial; margin: 0.0px 0.0px 16.0px 0.0px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">To help understand the difference between development and charity or aid, I will make a few definitions. These definitions are not meant as being necessarily technically accurate but simply to be used as tools to help focus our efforts. </span></div>
<div style="font: 12.0px Arial; margin: 0.0px 0.0px 16.0px 0.0px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">By charity, I mean giving materially to meet the immediate needs of people. The food pantry is a great example of charity. Currently, the world is seeing a famine in the Horn of Africa which may be the worst of our generation. Certainly, in these situations charity is absolutely necessary. These people need emergency aid and to stand by and watch such suffering is cold and inhumane. Nonetheless, wisdom compels us to think deeper about what we can do to help poor communities. </span></div>
<div style="font: 12.0px Arial; margin: 0.0px 0.0px 16.0px 0.0px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">Wisdom compels us to consider the idea of development. Development is the process of growing a person or a community’s capability to provide freedom from suffering for themselves. Development respects the agency of the individual. For example, about one billion people on the planet lack the capability to provide for themselves and their family’s nutrition. In these societies, men and women lack the education or the resources to generate value which can be consistently transacted for food. In these communities, the individuals lack the freedom to avoid malnourishment. The community is underdeveloped to the extent that its citizens lack opportunity. Our obligation is to assist in developing the capacity in these communities to give opportunity to their people. When we can provide such capacities through the application of wisdom and planning and resources, it is development that is our obligation. We are obligated not just to blindly give charity but to wisely assist in development. For example, charity might see the need for medicine while development sees the opportunity to develop a health care system. A health care system includes building nursing schools and for-profit hospitals. In such a system, businessmen build businesses, local nurses gain employment and local citizens gain access to health care. This example illustrates a few important differences between charity and development. </span></div>
<ol style="list-style-type: decimal;">
<li style="font: 12.0px Arial; margin: 0.0px 0.0px 16.0px 0.0px;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">Development requires leadership. Such a plan to develop, in this case, an improved health care system is a long term project. Intelligence is required to design a long-term plan. Emergency relief has its logistical difficulties but development of a health care system is far more complex. This involves the founding of schools and interaction with government agencies and educational institutions in the West. Such a plan is ambitious, but only such a plan for development actually brings prosperity and dignity to a community. Charity brings dignity to the giver while development brings dignity to the community being developed. </span></li>
<li style="font: 12.0px Arial; margin: 0.0px 0.0px 16.0px 0.0px;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">Development requires long-term commitment. Jesus taught us that when we make a plan to obey Him, we must consider the size of the challenge. Development is a commitment that requires extensive resources: time, money and intelligence. The church is an extensive institution that is prepared to make just this type of commitment. Christians are not alone in their plans to assist the poor of the world. We are perfectly situated to make long-term, even multigenerational, commitments to other communities around the globe. </span></li>
</ol>
<div style="font: 12.0px Arial; margin: 0.0px 0.0px 16.0px 0.0px;">
<span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">The time has come for Christians to move beyond charity and consider our obligation to bring to the poor of the world actual development and dignity. </span></div>
bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663932.post-45786107993046600042011-08-15T12:30:00.000-07:002011-08-15T12:31:22.435-07:00The Answers from Nouriel Roubini - Project Syndicate<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.project-syndicate.org/author_photo/6/a/2/3185_thumb.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://www.project-syndicate.org/author_photo/6/a/2/3185_thumb.jpg" /></a></div><a href="http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/roubini41/English">Is Capitalism Doomed? - Nouriel Roubini - Project Syndicate</a>:<br />
<div>This is so important to minimize global suffering. What is required is political courage: </div><div><blockquote>"The right balance today requires creating jobs partly through additional fiscal stimulus aimed at productive infrastructure investment. It also requires more progressive taxation; more short-term fiscal stimulus with medium- and long-term fiscal discipline; lender-of-last-resort support by monetary authorities to prevent ruinous runs on banks; reduction of the debt burden for insolvent households and other distressed economic agents; and stricter supervision and regulation of a financial system run amok; breaking up too-big-to-fail banks and oligopolistic trusts. <br />
Over time, advanced economies will need to invest in human capital, skills and social safety nets to increase productivity and enable workers to compete, be flexible and thrive in a globalized economy. The alternative is – like in the 1930s - unending stagnation, depression, currency and trade wars, capital controls, financial crisis, sovereign insolvencies, and massive social and political instability."</blockquote></div>bradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12080933939520737891noreply@blogger.com0